■ the water quality in the unit from April 27-October 29
■ the bogus appointment of 9/20 to apply "a filter" to provide a "temporary" remedy that will "hopefully hopefully help" after 5 months of doing nothing
Also see "Cash-Job Plumber" page; all texts to/from including the no-shows 5/10-6/17Kurt told me that he "doesn't want to do plumbing" any more but "a cash job is hard to turn down."Even his van claims that he is a "Sewer & Drain Specialist" - not a plumber.Additional info on his court appearances for Felony Stalking & Burglary.
3. Water quality test results (3rd party evaluation)
In response to my email of 5/10 where I wrote: "I’m also quite concerned re the water as it continues to be orange rather than the usual clear as seen in the picture of the toilet bowl. It is particularly disconcerting that the orange water morphs into particles that land on the bottom of the glass. An explanation and rectification of this situation is necessary." Nick's reply shows no surprise, no horror at the condition of the water. Instead, he claims "The water issues must be related to the pipes in the trailer itself and the new pipes should remedy that." "Must be" and "should remedy that" - doesn't support the claim that the new pipes were to improve the water pressure. He claimed on 5/10 that he was "not aware of many of the problems...." Obviously, he was aware of this problem given just the condition of the toilet bowls & the fact that he had already obtained an off-the-books plumber to replace the lines with no permit.
On 7/01, 63 days after I move my business, my life, and my two cats a bit over 200 miles, Nick writes "If the water remains unimproved, it may be necessary to replace lines below ground. ...may have to terminate the lease because we would not continue to rent the unit until that issue is remedied and it may take a considerable amount of time to remedy." They knew what was wrong with the water. The toilet bowls I discovered on 4/27 disprove his claim of "clean & good" water in the unit. Maybe the well itself is "clean & good" but rusted pipes are required to get the water from the well to the pump and more pipes from the pumphouse to the unit. They replaced the unit's lines because it was a cheaper method that maybe(?) could have worked or they just hoped it would work. Using a cash-job plumber with no permit also kept their cost down. Improving the water pressure was a pretense (lie) as the improvement in water pressure was minimal to nil.
Nick writes that repairs will be scheduled soon several times. He claims the water quality is priority and other repairs are "moot" (7/03 email), "continued problems indeed need to be addressed soon" (excerpt 7/01 email)," the info is forwarded to Delbert & addressed as soon as possible (5/10 email). Yet, they DID NOTHING to attempt correction after cash-job stopped the installation (plumber was in jail on 6/13 on charges of felony stalking in Stevens Point). There is no place IN a unit/house to put a single filter that will impact all water taps. Think about where you would put "a filter" that would affect every water tap in your own house (bathroom sink(s) bathtub(s), toilet(s), kitchen sink, dishwasher, etc.) IF possible, a filter on the unit's main water pipe would not have required entry into the unit. Given the amount of iron flowing from every tap, how often do you think a filter under the unit would have to be changed? Daily? Twice daily? Who would be responsible for that task?
They’re going to attach “a” filter "in" the unit that affects every tap (?) to "see if that helps"?
Oh, wait....forget that 9/12 thing because now Joey is going "back & forth with Pellner (sic) plumbing" on 9/16to find a "temporary" solution. Temporary? After 4 months & 21 days? Temporary? (email of 9/16 below on right)
The door is back-ordered? A week or two for arrival?? How much longer to install?
"A" filter that would "hopefully hopefully" help- after 4 months & 21 days.Carpet? what carpet is he talking about? carpet hasn't been mentioned anywhere by anyone previously.
Five Skies expected & received FULL rent for August. Silence from Five Skies from 7/16 - 9/10. 56 days.
At NO point, did they request an appointment to test or evaluate the problem. They KNEW what the problem was BEFORE they rented it to me HOPING new lines would fix it as Nick wrote on 5/10 (excerpt): the "new lines should remedy that." Nick's definition of the problem on 7/01: We will determine how best to approach that situation if the need arises but if that is the case we may have to terminate your lease because we would not continue to rent the unit until that issue is remedied and it may take a considerable amount of time to remedy. (underline added)
My plans to move last week of September/first week of October were in place waiting final confirmation in the next few days in order to set specific date to constructively evict myself.
Their plan? Write an email apologizing for this debacle? No
They choose to contact an attorney to threaten
◘ start eviction◘ turn off water◘ enter without notice >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>click to enlarge in new tab>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That'll teach the old lady who has been waiting 4 months & 21 days for usable water, door, and windows!
or
As Nick wrote in his 7/01 email: they would have to terminate (my) lease if repair involved underground lines because we would not continue to rent the unit until that issue is remedied..."
and in 7/03 email: if water can't be corrected other repairs are "moot"
Wisc §704.07(2), SPS 326.15, and SPS 326.25 disagree with him.
or
they just didn't want to do the repairs while collecting full rent. (Bingo!)
August full rent paid: zero contact re repairs or anything else, zero done since 7/17.
Let's choose the 2nd option as that is the choice made by Five Skies & their aiding & abetting scofflaw attorney, Patrick Arendt, as documented in their false claim of 10/14 for my eviction based on allegedly unpaid rent. Rent had been paid in accordance with §704.07(4) & the previous agreement with Five Skies for September. Rent was not due until October 15th and would have been late on October 20th.
off-the-booksadjective UK US ACCOUNTINGused to describe a payment that is not officially recorded, so that no tax is paid on itit does not mean the individual is licensed and/or insured as Joey asserts