1: Failure to disclose code violations

New Paragraph

Stay Out of Wisconsin


Arendt wrote:




Full email here

 
DOCUMENTATION SUBMITTED BY ARENDT:                              NONE
The facts & documentation in re Mr Arendt's misrepresentations, cherry picked facts, & lies about the building & housing code violations follow below:
► My complaint did not include this issue.  I didn't ask about code violations or notices prior to signing lease on 4/16.
     Silly me? I assumed Five Skies was law abiding, but I was wrong about that.
     Over 50 years of renting various residences in Boston, Colorado, California, & Minnesota, I don't recall ever asking about code violations or notices.
     Is it weird that has never a problem in over 50 years until I moved to Wisconsin?  Is it Wisconsin? Is it Five Skies? Is it Arendt?

► Ms Fuehrer, Saratoga's Building Inspector, appears to be unaware of Uniform Dwelling Code in re stairs or doesn't own a tape measure & needs new eyeglasses.
     Maybe Saratoga needs a new Building Inspector.

►  Arendt claims the unit was not occupied prior to renting it to me AND while the park was not owned by Five Skies.
      That is false.
      Five Skies purchased the property in 2015.
      Five Skies provided a new tenant with a six (6) month lease from 12/22/15-06/30/2016.
      On 02/01/16, Five Skies filed a claim for her eviction.
      On 03/16, Nick provided a document to the court specifying the damages caused by this tenant.  
      It is unlikely that he would have done this without his inspection of the unit; he claims that a door was damaged.
      He advertised the unit for rent "available now" on 03/24.  
      Yet on 5/10, his response to my email was that he was "not aware of many of the problems..."  
      None of the problems were hiding - they were all in plain sight.  The stairs, the screens, the windows, the door and especially the problem with the water.
      Arendt lied.  Nick lied (see screens email 04/20).
I'm new to Wisconsin.   Is this how things are done here?

Scofflaw landlord hires a scofflaw attorney to lie his bloomin' head off to a government agency & that's okay because he's an officer of the court.

A dishonest landlord who omits critical information to get the unit rented asap & then can't be bothered to perform repairs in accordance with the Uniform Dwelling Code,
Dept of Safety & Professional Services (DSPS), or comply with Wisc Chap 704.   They'll just  get rid of the old lady who signed their lease daring to think that she was moving 200 miles to expand her business but loses her license as they'd rather save a few bucks by not bothering with
► obtaining building permits for the plumbing or for stairs resulting in injury
►completing necessary repairs to door and windows
► hiring a plumber off the books who can't be bothered to show up for appointments or to finish the job (in part because he was in jail for felony stalking)
     while leaving the tenant with no laundry connection, no outdoor tap, rust water well over EPA GRAS standard;
     and sewage on the lawn for 18 days (47 days to correct almost to Wood County & DSPS code)
Based on Arendt's email to the DATCP:
He is knowledgeable about everything pre-Day 1 of my tenancy and all days to the last.
He received the documentation I submitted to the DATCP.   He participated in the bogus appointment of 9/20.
Credit where credit is due:  He does work very hard to cover landlord's buttocks with lies, hogwash, & deception while padding a false court claim with a few extra dollars.

Is this how things are supposed to be done by a member of the Wisconsin Bar and Officer of the Court?
   Back to Top   
Share by: