Stay Out of Wisconsin
3 (2 of 2): Bogus 09 20 appointment
Stay Out of Wisconsin
DOCUMENTATION SUBMITTED BY ARENDT: NONE
The facts & documentation in re Mr Arendt's misrepresentations, cherry picked facts, & lies about the bogus appointment of 9/20:
2nd half of paragraph below & followed by a translation into facts disregarded by Arendt of what sort of appears to be his description of the bogus 9/20 appointment he coerced with his 9/16 email.
Arendt wrote: “the park agreed to add a water filter to rectify water clarity issues…complained about.”
"the park agreed" ..... passive voice noted. Let's assume "the park" is Nick Kedrowski as he is the General Agent.
The condition of the toilet bowls
& water flowing from every tap I discovered when I moved in on 4/27 belie Nick claims that the water might be "clean & good" in the well, but it is NOT "clean & good" IN the unit. See Water
on this site.
He wasn't even a little bit surprised, much less horrified, by my inital email of 5/10
describing the water:
I’m also quite concerned re the water as it continues to be orange rather than the usual clear as seen in the picture of the toilet bowl. It is particularly disconcerting that the orange water morphs into particles that land on the bottom of the glass. An explanation and rectification of this situation is necessary.
Was Nick shocked by my description of the unit's water? No, he merely confirmed the water problems in his emails of 5/10
& 7/01.
5/10: The water issues must be related to the pipes in the trailer itself and the new lines should remedy
that.
The alleged reason for the new lines was to improve water pressure.
Given the "improvement" was minimal to nil (especially in the bathtub), I see no reason to think that the
factual reason was to remedy the outrageous amount of iron in the unit's water. There is every reason to
think that water pressure was solely pretextual.
7/01:
Nick did not suggest a filter in his email of 7/01. He defined both the problem & his solution:
If the water remains unimproved, it may be necessary to replace lines below ground. We will determine
how best to approach that situation if the need arises but if that is the case, we may have to terminate
how best to approach that situation if the need arises but if that is the case, we may have to terminate
your lease because we would not continue to rent the unit until that issue is remedied and it may take a\
considerable amount of time to remedy."
Problem: underground lines
Solution: they will choose to kick me out 63 days after I moved in rather than correct the problem
they knew of in March.
Nick's solution is not provided in 704.07(4):
"...the landlord proceeds promptly to repair or rebuild or
eliminate the health hazard or the substantial violation of sub. (2) materially affecting the health or
safety of the tenant..."
They advertised it as "available now" in March & chose not to inform me of the potential (likely) problem
before I signed the lease. When the new lines failed to correct the problem, they informed me would
terminate my lease rather than continue to rent the unit until that issue is remedied.....i.e., fraud.
Arendt wrote: “….first refused access to complete the repair when Five Skies was 5 minutes late….”
Arendt's writing fiction. There was never a time since 4/27 when Five Skies was refused access because they were 5 minutes late.
IF he's referring to the 9/20 appointment @ 10am: I emailed Joey
at 10:30 advising that I deemed
them a no-show.
them a no-show.
Joey replied 4 minutes later that "we are here" & they were talking with him. He said they'd be over
when they were done talking with Arendt. The old lady should wait for the men to be done talking.
Really. That's what he wrote.
They were 20-25 minutes late in mid-June because Joey said he overslept. They proceeded to stick
the stick-on tiles on the floor.
Maybe
they were 5 minutes late on 7/16 but they proceeded to look at the water (say & do nothing),
drill one window open & stick a pin in a door hinge.
Five Skies requested NO appointments from 7/17 - 9/10, 56 days. Sewage on my lawn from 8/22 - 9/08.
Having made none
of the repairs detailed on 5/10, Five Skies demanded full rent for the month of August. The entire month of August elapsed without one contact re repairs & they did nothing
about the necessary repairs. They did find time to cash my check
of 8/15 and even send a receipt.
Arendt wrote: “…after that date she refused access to make the repair.”
Okay, Arendt - your unmitigated gobbleydygook is tiresome. Here's the
documented timeline:
9/12 email from Joey: appointment for 9/13 was declined, Less than 24 hrs notice & past deadline to
complete (not start) repairs.
To attach "a filter" to "see if that helps." That isn't what is legally required (704.07(4)). Nick had
guaranteed a minimum 24 hr notice.
This does suggest that Arendt, Residential Real Estate expert, is not familiar with the legal
This does suggest that Arendt, Residential Real Estate expert, is not familiar with the legal
requirements of a landlord.
Oh, wait....forget that 9/12 email because now
Joey is going "back & forth with Pellner (sic)
plumbing"
on 9/16
to find a "temporary" solution. Temporary? After 4 months & 21 days? Temporary?
Arendt:
a "temporary"
solution that "might help" is NOT, by definition, a repair.
Past the deadline to complete repairs. Way past "promptly." Appointment was declined.
Maybe because I'd written on 9/03 that I'd contact government agencies & seek legal remedy
for their
failure to perform necessary repairs in accordance with Wisconsin statutory law, abide by the UDC,
and DSPS regulations, Joey's next step was to call their attorney, i.e., Arendt, rather than comply with
relevant laws, UDC, & regulations.
Arendt wrote an email to Joey about the contents of my 9/03 letter. Does he remember doing that? Yes, No? He doesn't mention it in his reply to the DATCP. It was that coercive email
that intimidated me sufficiently to agree to the sham appointment on 9/20. Knowing, at the same time, that my plan to constructively evict myself in about 10 days was in place.
Arendt wrote: “The addition of a water filter to address the water clarity issue was to be completed by a licensed plumber.”
I have to wonder whether it caused him a siginificant increase in his stress level to write an accurate, albeit, non-defamatory sentence.
This doesn't match up with Nick's written statement that "Kurt will not return to the property" on 7/01
but I was glad to hear the 20 year old boy who had his Uncle check his work after putting a pin in a door hinge wouldn't be providing the labor for the task.
There is no place IN the unit to install "a filter" that will impact every tap. Maybe, I don't know, there is a water main that maybe might accommodate "a filter." Can't imagine how often one (and not this one) would have to crawl under the unit to replace "a filter" given the volume of iron flowing from every tap. It's the end of September - how's that going to work in the winter???
A "temporary" solution that will "hopefully hopefully help" is not an option almost five (5) months after I moved in. Nor does it square with §704.07(4)
to "promptly to repair or rebuild or eliminate the health hazard or the
substantial violation of sub. (2) ....
Click to enlarge in new tab
Arendt wrote: “The plumber was unable to complete the repair initially due (sic) her refusal to allow access…”
Initially means 'first.'
The "first" effort to correct the water situation occurred on 9/12 with Joey's email:
I declined because it was after the deadline & did not provide the 24 hr minimum notice that Nick had "guaranteed." That's the email where Joey wanted to attach a filter to "see if that helps." Doesn't sound like a remedy and this first (initial) attempt was aborted by Joey.
This is easily proven by his 2nd email of 9/16 in which he plans to "attach a filter as a temporary solution for the water. I am going back and forth with Pellner (sic)
plumbing to get something work it (sic), which will take some time." So, he doesn't actually know what he's going to do on their 2nd attempt either.
They knew there was a problem with the unit's water when they advertised the unit as "available now" in March. It's impossible to look at the toilet bowls
I first saw on 4/27 and conclude that the water is "clean & good" in the unit. It is now the middle of September.
Arendt wrote: “Subsequently the the (sic) plumber had a family issue and the repair had been delayed due to his unavailability..."
Arendt's all tangled up in a web of his lies and it looks like Joey tried to help....let's see what the documentation says:
Arendt's emai of 9/16 coerced the 9/20 appointment. Details are on this site here.
Nutshell version of 9/20 appointment:
Appointment was for 10:00am
I was 100% ready & waiting with a fully charged phone to video the entire appointment
on 9/20 at 10:a.m.
No one had showed up or called or texted or emailed by 10:30
Joey replied that they were talking with Arendt & they would be over when they were "done talking with him."
The 20 year old boy tells this old lady to wait for the men to be done talking.
I heard nothing more from them that day: No cancel, no sorry, no reschedule, just a no show.
On 10/04 at 4:20pm, I received a pop-up notification that Joey had sent an email.
He claimed that "Kurt is in Madison..." Note: IS in Madison. Gmail time-stamped his email at 11:40 on 9/20.
Obviously they were not ALL there as he claimed on 9/20 at 10;34: "We are here right now...."
In fact, the only person authorized to perform the task of installing whatever harebrained filter they plan to try to "see if that helps" is NOT there to do it.
I did not hear anything from anyone with Five Skies ever again.
Arendt wrote: “... and the continuing refusal of the (sic)
Ms. XXXXXXXXXX to provide access.”
Arendt is referring to a time frame after
the plumber's family issue that occurred on 9/20.
It is literally impossible to refuse an appointment that is not requested. I heard nothing from any Five Skies representative after Joey's email
on 9/20 except for the bizarre email from Joey at 4:20pm on 10/04 time stamped by Gmail at 11:40am on 9/20 indicating that he would reschedule. He didn't do that. He also forgot that his dad guaranteed
a minimum 24 hr notice on 7/01.
There was no email, text, call, or in-person request to reschedule 9/20 or after 10/04.
I'm new to Wisconsin, is this how things are done here?
Scofflaw landlord hires a scofflaw attorney to lie his bloomin' head off to the DATCP (a government agency) and the Wood County Court?
A dishonest landlord who can't be bothered to perform repairs in accordance with the Uniform Dwelling Code, Dept of Safety & Professional Services (DSPS)
or comply with any part of Wisc Chap 704 so they’d prefer just to get rid of the old lady who dared to think that she was moving 200 miles to expand her business
but loses her license due to their effort to save a few bucks by not bothering with building permits
& hiring a plumber off the books who can't be bothered to show up to finish the job?
Based on his email to the DATCP, Attorney Arendt is knowledgeable about everything pre-Day 1 and all points in time to the last.
As a result of his intervention & in which he participated in person or by phone on the 9/20 appointment was scheduled. No one showed up and no one rescheduled.
Apparently, he is just fine with all
of the Kedrowskis' unlawful actions & inactions. He works hard to cover landlord's buttocks with lies, hogwash, deception, & misrepresentations.
Is this how things are supposed
to be done in Wisconsin by landlords and an Officer of the Court?
Click to enlarge photos in new tab.
