Stay Out of Wisconsin
Copy of 3b: Water & Wood County Health Dept
Stay Out of Wisconsin
The facts in re Mr Arendt's misrepresentations, cherry picked facts, & lies about water & the bogus attempt to correct on 9/20
Arendt wrote: “A complaint was made that the water in her unit was unsanitary."
I'm pretty well convinced that Arendt wouldn't tell the truth about yesterday's weather.
I never used the word unsanitary. However, unsanitary would apply unless you think chunks of iron in your glass of water is a clean, healthy beverage and showering in the water on the right is a a good idea. Because, after all, this is just how things are supposed
to be for tenants in Wood County, Wisconsin.
As a close-call invasive breast cancer survivor, it seemed...just plain asinine to drink, bathe, brush teeth, cook with iron that tested anywhere from 667-6667% OVER the level generally recognized as safe by the EPA. (June, July, August)
The water from each tap varied day by day, hour by hour. Clear looking water tested at 2.00 ppm not 0.30 ppm per EPA GRAS. See the wide variety of "water" from different taps below.
I emailed
Wood County Health Dept with a question asking to whom I should direct questions regarding water quality. Nancy Eggleston
at Wood County Health called it a complaint.
“She then refused access…” That’s a lie too, Arendt.
At NO time did Wood County Health Dept request access to inspect/test water INSIDE the unit because they don't test water IN units. Kate's email on right confirm "tests are done from the wells, not the homes."
At NO time did Five Skies request an appointment to 'test or inspect' the situation.
On 5/10, Nick wrote that "The water issues must be related to the pipes in the unit and the new lines in the trailer itself and the new lines should remedy that." Note: "must be" and "new lines should remedy that"
On 7/01, Nick wrote "If the water remains unimproved, it may be necessary to replace lines below ground. We will determine how best to approach that situation if the need arises but if that is the case, we may have to terminate your lease because we would not continue to rent.... "
Nick hoped/expected/wanted the new lines in the unit to "remedy that." When that didn't work, he defined the problem on 7/01 and informed me that they would terminate my lease 63 days after I moved in rather than correct it. Joey & Delbert saw the water on 7/16, walked away, said nothing, did nothing. I did not hear from anyone at Five Skies about anything for the next 57 days when I happened to see Joey on the property (9/11).
Their lack of interest or action in any assessment of the problem leaves me with but one conclusion:Nick knew there was a problem with iron in the unit's water. Did he respond to my 5/10 email with WHAT? There's iron in the water? No. He wasn't surprised at all that massive quantities of iron were in the water. He just wrote that the "new lines should remedy that." Not "will remedy that" - but "should."They knew there was a possibility or probability BEFORE I moved in that the new lines might not correct the problem. & they had no intention of correcting the problem. They said the unit was "available now" on 3/24. They did not inform me of the fact that the unit's new pipes might NOT correct the iron problem which they also omitted from their conversation with me on 3/27 and in all emails prior to my decision to rent the unit on 4/16. They expected me to pay full rent despite Wisconsin laws re abatement and their legal responsibility to correct problems. I call that fraud.
Arendt wrote: “...water was subsequently tested outside faucet (sic)
and was found to be within acceptable levels by the Wood County (sic).
The outdoor water connection did NOT test at an acceptable level, Arendt. It tested at 0.4 ppm not 0.3 ppm.
One test from one tap reflect the situation in the unit as it has been documented again and again to Five Skies from 5/10 - 9/11.
As Ms Carlson states in her email (above), water is tested from the well not the house taps. It's pretty damn obvious that one does not drink, bathe, brush teeth, cook, etc. from the well itself.
Pipes are required to bring the water FROM the well TO the pumphouse and FROM the pumphouse TO the unit as Arendt, Five Skies & virtually every sentient human being well knows & Nick confirmed in his emails of 5/10
and 7/01.
I emailed
Wood County Health Dept with a question asking to whom I should direct questions regarding water quality. Nancy Eggleston
at Wood County Health called it a complaint.
“She then refused access…” That’s a lie too, Arendt.
At NO time did Wood County Health Dept request access to inspect/test water INSIDE the unit because they don't test water IN units. Kate's email on right confirm "tests are done from the wells, not the homes."
At NO time did Five Skies request an appointment to 'test or inspect' the situation.
On 5/10, Nick wrote that "The water issues must be related to the pipes in the unit and the new lines in the trailer itself and the new lines should remedy that." Note: "must be" and "new lines should remedy that"
On 7/01, Nick wrote "If the water remains unimproved, it may be necessary to replace lines below ground. We will determine how best to approach that situation if the need arises but if that is the case, we may have to terminate your lease because we would not continue to rent.... "
Nick hoped/expected/wanted the new lines in the unit to "remedy that." When that didn't work, he defined the problem on 7/01 and informed me that they would terminate my lease 63 days after I moved in rather than correct it. Joey & Delbert saw the water on 7/16, walked away, said nothing, did nothing. I did not hear from anyone at Five Skies about anything for the next 57 days when I happened to see Joey on the property (9/11).
Their lack of interest or action in any assessment of the problem leaves me with but one conclusion:Nick knew there was a problem with iron in the unit's water. Did he respond to my 5/10 email with WHAT? There's iron in the water? No. He wasn't surprised at all that massive quantities of iron were in the water. He just wrote that the "new lines should remedy that." Not "will remedy that" - but "should."They knew there was a possibility or probability BEFORE I moved in that the new lines might not correct the problem. & they had no intention of correcting the problem. They said the unit was "available now" on 3/24. They did not inform me of the fact that the unit's new pipes might NOT correct the iron problem which they also omitted from their conversation with me on 3/27 and in all emails prior to my decision to rent the unit on 4/16. They expected me to pay full rent despite Wisconsin laws re abatement and their legal responsibility to correct problems. I call that fraud.
In fact, at 8:28 am on 10/04, Kate Carlson of Wood County Health Department wrote testing is NOT done IN homes (email on right, click to enlarge).
“She then refused access…” That’s a lie too, Arendt.
At NO time did Wood County Health Dept request access to inspect/test water INSIDE the unit because they don't test water IN units. Kate's email on right confirm "tests are done from the wells, not the homes."
At NO time did Five Skies request an appointment to 'test or inspect' the situation.
On 5/10, Nick wrote that "The water issues must be related to the pipes in the unit and the new lines in the trailer itself and the new lines should remedy that." Note: "must be" and "new lines should remedy that"
On 7/01, Nick wrote "If the water remains unimproved, it may be necessary to replace lines below ground. We will determine how best to approach that situation if the need arises but if that is the case, we may have to terminate your lease because we would not continue to rent.... "
Nick hoped/expected/wanted the new lines in the unit to "remedy that." When that didn't work, he defined the problem on 7/01 and informed me that they would terminate my lease 63 days after I moved in rather than correct it. Joey & Delbert saw the water on 7/16, walked away, said nothing, did nothing. I did not hear from anyone at Five Skies about anything for the next 57 days when I happened to see Joey on the property (9/11).
Their lack of interest or action in any assessment of the problem leaves me with but one conclusion:Nick knew there was a problem with iron in the unit's water. Did he respond to my 5/10 email with WHAT? There's iron in the water? No. He wasn't surprised at all that massive quantities of iron were in the water. He just wrote that the "new lines should remedy that." Not "will remedy that" - but "should."They knew there was a possibility or probability BEFORE I moved in that the new lines might not correct the problem. & they had no intention of correcting the problem. They said the unit was "available now" on 3/24. They did not inform me of the fact that the unit's new pipes might NOT correct the iron problem which they also omitted from their conversation with me on 3/27 and in all emails prior to my decision to rent the unit on 4/16. They expected me to pay full rent despite Wisconsin laws re abatement and their legal responsibility to correct problems.I call that fraud.
Click to enlarge in new tab.
I'm pretty well convinced that Arendt wouldn't tell the truth about yesterday's weather.
I never used the word unsanitary. However, unsanitary would apply unless you think chunks of iron in your glass of water is a clean, healthy beverage and showering in the water on the right is a a good idea. Because, after all, this is just how things are supposed
to be for tenants in Wood County, Wisconsin.
As a close-call invasive breast cancer survivor, it seemed...just plain asinine to drink, bathe, brush teeth, cook with iron that tested anywhere from 667-6667% OVER the level generally recognized as safe by the EPA. (June, July, August)
The water from each tap varied day by day, hour by hour. Clear looking water tested at 2.00 ppm not 0.30 ppm per EPA GRAS. See the wide variety of "water" from different taps below.
I emailed
Wood County Health Dept with a question asking to whom I should direct questions regarding water quality. Nancy Eggleston
at Wood County Health called it a complaint.
“She then refused access…” That’s a lie too, Arendt.
At NO time did Wood County Health Dept request access to inspect/test water INSIDE the unit because they don't test water IN units. Kate's email on right confirm "tests are done from the wells, not the homes."
At NO time did Five Skies request an appointment to 'test or inspect' the situation.
On 5/10, Nick wrote that "The water issues must be related to the pipes in the unit and the new lines in the trailer itself and the new lines should remedy that." Note: "must be" and "new lines should remedy that"
On 7/01, Nick wrote "If the water remains unimproved, it may be necessary to replace lines below ground. We will determine how best to approach that situation if the need arises but if that is the case, we may have to terminate your lease because we would not continue to rent.... "
Nick hoped/expected/wanted the new lines in the unit to "remedy that." When that didn't work, he defined the problem on 7/01 and informed me that they would terminate my lease 63 days after I moved in rather than correct it. Joey & Delbert saw the water on 7/16, walked away, said nothing, did nothing. I did not hear from anyone at Five Skies about anything for the next 57 days when I happened to see Joey on the property (9/11).
Their lack of interest or action in any assessment of the problem leaves me with but one conclusion:Nick knew there was a problem with iron in the unit's water. Did he respond to my 5/10 email with WHAT? There's iron in the water? No. He wasn't surprised at all that massive quantities of iron were in the water. He just wrote that the "new lines should remedy that." Not "will remedy that" - but "should."They knew there was a possibility or probability BEFORE I moved in that the new lines might not correct the problem. & they had no intention of correcting the problem. They said the unit was "available now" on 3/24. They did not inform me of the fact that the unit's new pipes might NOT correct the iron problem which they also omitted from their conversation with me on 3/27 and in all emails prior to my decision to rent the unit on 4/16. They expected me to pay full rent despite Wisconsin laws re abatement and their legal responsibility to correct problems. I call that fraud.
The outdoor water connection did NOT test at an acceptable level, Arendt. It tested at 0.4 ppm not 0.3 ppm.
Nor does one test from one tap reflect the situation in the unit
as it has been documented again and again to Five Skies from 5/10-7/16.
As Ms Carlson states in her email (above), water is tested from the well not the house taps. It's pretty damn obvious that one does not drink, bathe, brush teeth, cook, etc. from the well itself.
I'm new to Wisconsin. Is this how things are supposed to be done here?
Scofflaw landlord hires a scofflaw attorney to lie his bloomin' head off to a government agency & that's okay because he's an attorney?
A dishonest landlord who can't be bothered to perform repairs in accordance with the Uniform Dwelling Code, Dept of Safety & Professional Services (DSPS) or comply with Wisc Chap 704 so they’d prefer just to get rid of the old lady who dared to think that she was moving 200 miles to expand her business but loses her license due to their effort to save a few bucks by not bothering with
► obtaining building permits for plumbing or stairs
►completing necessary repairs to door and windows
► hiring a plumber off the books who can't be bothered to show up for appointments or to finish the job (in part becausehe was in jail for felony stalking) while leaving the tenant with no laundry, no outdoor tap, and this water for 6 months:
Based on Arendt's email to the DATCP:
He is knowledgeable about everything pre-Day 1 of my tenancy and all days to the last. However, neither he nor Nick & Joey knew that I had already constructively evicted myself.
Credit where credit is due: Arendt does work very
hard to cover landlord's buttocks with lies, hogwash, & deception while trying to pad a fraudulent claim with extra dollars.
Is this how things are supposed
to be done by a member of the Wisconsin Bar and Officer of the Court?