See the
twelve (12) pages on this site debunking each of Arendt's statements. He claims knowledge of all events & details of situations prior to my move-in 4/27 thru 9/20. All are complete fictions to support Five Skies fraudulent rental of the unit and failure to perform the duties of landlord described in
704.07(2).
Joey contacted Arendt after receipt of my
9/15 rent payment & letter, although Arendt's email is in response to my letter of 9/03: Threats to start eviction, turn off water, enter w/o notice; 'arbitrary' time frame (
also see Arendt 3 (2 of 2)
He coerced & participated in the sham appointment of 9/20 to install "a filter" that will "hopefully help" after they'd been notified 11 times beginning on 5/10 & over the next 4 months. They had known since 3/24 & chosen to withhold that info from me before I sgned lease.
No repairs were done since initial notification
5/10. From my
letter of 9/03: 2 repairs done: screen fabric over torn, holey screens & pin replaced in door hinge. 9/28, Arendt writes a sentence that has nothing to do with rent but everything to do with their motivation to get this old lady out: "It appears that you are unhappy with the manner in which my client manages its trailer park." (original notice, letter, & envelope available)
Reported to Building Inspector stairs were not to code on 9/24 causing injuries on 9/16; stairs repaired 9/26; notice taped to door 9/28 = Retaliation
Arendt cited §
704.17(1)
incorrectly on the notice: it is for month-month or week-week tenancies. He should have cited
704.17(2)
for tenancies under a lease for one year or less, and year-to-year tenancies. Legaling is hard especially for those who have expertise in residential real estate, right? The
due date for rent was changed by agreement with Joey
beginning August.
Receipt & check
for August: 0 balance, 0 late fees. Forget facts & documentation, Arendt & Joey choose to claim rent was due on the 1st and not the 15th resulting in an
overage in late fees assessed of $70.00. Would help with the money problems Joey claimed they were having on 9/11. Maybe 'close enough' is just how legal is done in Wisconsin. He later complained that I "refused" to pick up the certified mailing of the same notice taped to the door. I didn't need two copies; he could have sent by regular US mail, i.e., there is
no requirement for certified mail.
Conspired with Joey to file claim for full Sept rent that was
paid & abated
in accordance with
704.07(4). They filed for full October rent on 14th that was not due until
Oct 15. None of the repairs cited in 5/10 email & required by
704.07(2)
had been completed 5 months, 5 days (158 days) later depriving me of "full normal use" & which both Joey & Arendt knew to be true. Re Retaliation
704.45 : Notice to Vacate/Pay posted 2 days (9/26) after repair of not-to-code stairs resulting in my injuries and 4 days after my visit to Building Inspector (9/24). Claim for eviction filed 9 days after my call to Wood County Health Department on 10/4 regarding water quality.
Posted on cabinet "at least 5 years" per Amanda. If can't be served, leave on door, mail, post affidavit of mailing, DO NOT HAVE THEM PUBLISH
Arendt published in newspaper further destroying my reputation personally and as an insurance/annuity broker.
No affidavidt of mailing
listed on court's website. Arendt doesn't bother with this simple procedure: post and/or mail. They thought I was still in residence there on 11/22, so why didn't he mail it? Because he did not want me to see what he & Joey claimed because they knew it to be antithetical to the documented facts.
IF I HAD RECEIVED A COPY of the fraudulent S & C by snail mail, posting, or email: I would have handled the Answer & CounterClaim differently given the false claim information on the Summons & Complaint and retaining claim re retaliation.