Chronology

Chronology: 3/24-10/04

New Paragraph

cipation:

Are facts, truth, and law relevant to the practice of law in Wisconsin? I don't see anything to support that notion.

Can landlords and attorneys just do & say whatever they want to get what they want? Based on my experience, yes.

Egregious fraudulent actions of scofflaw landlord aided & abetted by attorney at law --- fraud, statute & code violations are okay in Wood County, Wisconsin? Definitely.

Chronology of Siginificant Events

March-April

May

June

July

August

September

Arendt knew that the 9/20 appointment re water was a no show, no cancel, and no reschedule per Joey's email to me of 9/20 (talking w/Arendt) & his own email to DATCP.

Keeping in mind that I had paid abated rent on the agreed upon date, Sept 15. (See 8/15 August check). September's check was submitted with letter adjusting abatement for Aug/Sep in accordance with Wisc §704.07(4),i.e., rent abates to the extent the tenant is deprived of the full normal use of the premises (couldn't take a bath, couldn't open/close a window, couldn't use door to get in/out, couldn't drink a glass of water, couldn't fill the cats' water bowl, etc., etc., etc.)

Arendt calculated rent due IN FULL with Late Charges from Sept 1.
Attorneys & scofflaw landlords can just do whatever they want - make up stuff as they go along ignoring previous written agreements & Wisconsin law?
That's how it's done in Wood County Wisconsin?

Fraud on the court occurs when the judicial machinery itself has been tainted, such as when an attorney, who is an officer of the court, is involved in the perpetration of a fraud or makes material misrepresentations to the court.

PLEASE NOTE: Governor Walker forwarded my letter of 9/26 to Michelle Reinen, Director - Bureau of Consumer Protection/DATCP with his instructions to file an expedited complaint.

While I won't say DATCP is a worthless use of time/energy, I would say it's close to that. DATCP has no power of enforcement. When they collect "enough" info re any particular business, landlord,...well, to be honest I don't know what they do. Send a stern "don't do that" letter, maybe. How much info is enough? How many people need to be hurt before they do whatever they do...."depends."

After Nick & Arendt sent their bogus "responses," I received an email from DATCP confirming no enforcement; their recommendation: small claims court and "Have a nice day!"